This tutorial will teach you how to create an application that converts natural language questions into SQL queries, and then evaluating how well
the queries work. We'll even make an improvement to the prompts, and evaluate the impact! By the time you finish this tutorial, you should be ready
to run your own experiments.
Before starting, please make sure that you have a Braintrust account. If you do not, please sign up .
The next few commands will install some libraries and include some helper code for the text2sql application. Feel free to copy/paste/tweak/reuse this code in your own tools.
! pip install braintrust duckdb datasets openai pyarrow python - Levenshtein autoevals
We're going to use a public dataset called WikiSQL that contains natural language questions and their corresponding SQL queries.
In this section, we'll take a look at the dataset and ground truth text/sql pairs to better understand the problem and data.
from datasets import load_dataset
data = list (load_dataset( "wikisql" )[ "test" ])
Here's an example question:
idx = 1
data[idx][ "question" ]
'What clu was in toronto 1995-96'
We'll use Arrow and DuckDB to help us explore the data and run SQL queries on it:
import duckdb
import pyarrow as pa
def get_table (table):
rows = [
{h: row[i] for (i, h) in enumerate (table[ "header" ])} for row in table[ "rows" ]
]
return pa.Table.from_pylist(rows)
table = get_table(data[idx][ "table" ])
duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , 'SELECT * FROM "table"' )
┌──────────────────────┬─────────┬───────────────┬────────────────┬──────────────────┬──────────────────┐
│ Player │ No. │ Nationality │ Position │ Years in Toronto │ School/Club Team │
│ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │
├──────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────┼────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────┤
│ Aleksandar Radojević │ 25 │ Serbia │ Center │ 1999-2000 │ Barton CC (KS) │
│ Shawn Respert │ 31 │ United States │ Guard │ 1997-98 │ Michigan State │
│ Quentin Richardson │ N/A │ United States │ Forward │ 2013-present │ DePaul │
│ Alvin Robertson │ 7, 21 │ United States │ Guard │ 1995-96 │ Arkansas │
│ Carlos Rogers │ 33, 34 │ United States │ Forward-Center │ 1995-98 │ Tennessee State │
│ Roy Rogers │ 9 │ United States │ Forward │ 1998 │ Alabama │
│ Jalen Rose │ 5 │ United States │ Guard-Forward │ 2003-06 │ Michigan │
│ Terrence Ross │ 31 │ United States │ Guard │ 2012-present │ Washington │
└──────────────────────┴─────────┴───────────────┴────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┘
In WikiSQL, the queries are formatted as a series of projection and filter expressions. Although there is a human_readable
field, it's not valid SQL!
{'human_readable': 'SELECT School/Club Team FROM table WHERE Years in Toronto = 1995-96',
'sel': 5,
'agg': 0,
'conds': {'column_index': [4],
'operator_index': [0],
'condition': ['1995-96']}}
Let's define a codegen_query
function that turns it into executable SQL.
AGG_OPS = [ None , "MAX" , "MIN" , "COUNT" , "SUM" , "AVG" ]
COND_OPS = [ " ILIKE " , ">" , "<" ] # , "OP"]
def esc_fn (s):
return f '''" { s.replace( '"' , '""' ) } "'''
def esc_value (s):
if isinstance (s, str ):
return s.replace( "'" , "''" )
else :
return s
def codegen_query (query):
header = query[ "table" ][ "header" ]
projection = f " { esc_fn(header[query[ 'sql' ][ 'sel' ]]) } "
agg_op = AGG_OPS [query[ "sql" ][ "agg" ]]
if agg_op is not None :
projection = f " { agg_op } ( { projection } )"
conds = query[ "sql" ][ "conds" ]
filters = " and " .join(
[
f """ { esc_fn(header[field]) }{COND_OPS [cond] } ' { esc_value(value) } '"""
for (field, cond, value) in zip (
conds[ "column_index" ], conds[ "operator_index" ], conds[ "condition" ]
)
]
)
if filters:
filters = f " WHERE { filters } "
return f 'SELECT { projection } FROM "table" { filters } '
gt_sql = codegen_query(data[idx])
print (gt_sql)
SELECT "School/Club Team" FROM "table" WHERE "Years in Toronto" ILIKE '1995-96'
Now, we can run this SQL directly.
duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , gt_sql)
┌──────────────────┐
│ School/Club Team │
│ varchar │
├──────────────────┤
│ Arkansas │
└──────────────────┘
import duckdb
import pyarrow as pa
from datasets import load_dataset
from Levenshtein import distance
NUM_TEST_EXAMPLES = 10
# Define some helper functions
def green (s):
return " \x1b [32m" + s + " \x1b [0m"
def run_query (sql, table_record):
table = get_table(table_record) # noqa
rel_from_arrow = duckdb.arrow(table)
result = rel_from_arrow.query( "table" , sql).fetchone()
if result and len (result) > 0 :
return result[ 0 ]
return None
def score (r1, r2):
if r1 is None and r2 is None :
return 1
if r1 is None or r2 is None :
return 0
r1, r2 = str (r1), str (r2)
total_len = max ( len (r1), len (r2))
return 1 - distance(r1, r2) / total_len
In this section, we'll create our first experiment and analyze the results in Braintrust.
import os
from braintrust import wrap_openai
from openai import OpenAI
client = wrap_openai(
OpenAI( api_key = os.environ.get( "OPENAI_API_KEY" , "Your OPENAI_API_KEY here" ))
)
def text2sql (input):
table = input [ "table" ]
meta = " \n " .join( f '" { h } "' for h in table[ "header" ])
messages = [
{
"role" : "system" ,
"content" : f """
Print a SQL query (over a table named "table" quoted with double quotes) that answers the question below.
You have the following columns:
{ meta }
The user will provide a question. Reply with a valid ANSI SQL query that answers the question, and nothing else.""" ,
},
{
"role" : "user" ,
"content" : f "Question: {input [ 'question' ] } " ,
},
]
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
model = "gpt-3.5-turbo" ,
messages = messages,
)
sql_text = resp.choices[ 0 ].message.content
return sql_text.rstrip( ";" )
output_sql = text2sql(data[idx])
print (output_sql)
duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , output_sql)
SELECT "School/Club Team"
FROM "table"
WHERE "Years in Toronto" = '1995-96'
┌──────────────────┐
│ School/Club Team │
│ varchar │
├──────────────────┤
│ Arkansas │
└──────────────────┘
Exciting! Now that we've tested it out on an example, we can run an evaluation on a bigger dataset to understand how well the prompt works.
To run an eval, we simply need to stitch together the pieces we've already created into the Eval()
function, which takes:
The data you want to evaluate
A task
function that, given some input, returns an output
One or more scoring functions that evaluate the output.
Let's start by logging into Braintrust. You can technically skip this step if you've set BRAINTRUST_API_KEY
in your environment.
import braintrust
braintrust.login(
api_key = os.environ.get( "BRAINTRUST_API_KEY" , "Your BRAINTRUST_API_KEY here" )
)
Next, we need to figure out how we'll score the outputs. One way is to string compare the SQL queries. This is not a perfect signal, because two different query strings might return the correct result, but it is a useful signal about how different the generated query is from the ground truth.
from autoevals import Levenshtein
Levenshtein().eval( output = output_sql, expected = gt_sql)
Score(name='Levenshtein', score=0.9113924050632911, metadata={}, error=None)
A more robust way to test the queries is to run them on a database and compare the results. We'll use DuckDB for this. We'll define a scoring function that runs the generated SQL and compares the results to the ground truth.
from autoevals import Score
@braintrust.traced
def result_score (output, expected, input):
expected_answer = run_query(expected, input [ "table" ])
# These log statements allow us to see the expected and output values in the Braintrust UI
braintrust.current_span().log( expected = expected_answer)
try :
output_answer = run_query(output, input [ "table" ])
except Exception as e:
return Score( name = "SQL Result" , score = 0 , metadata = { "message" : f "Error: { e } " })
braintrust.current_span().log( output = output_answer)
return Score(
name = "SQL Result" ,
score = Levenshtein()( output = output_answer, expected = expected_answer).score,
)
result_score(output_sql, gt_sql, data[idx])
Score(name='SQL Result', score=1.0, metadata={}, error=None)
from braintrust import EvalAsync
await EvalAsync(
"Text2SQL Cookbook" ,
data = [
{ "input" : d, "expected" : codegen_query(d), "metadata" : { "idx" : i}}
for (i, d) in enumerate (data[: NUM_TEST_EXAMPLES ])
],
task = text2sql,
scores = [Levenshtein, result_score],
)
Experiment text-2-sql-1706754968 is running at https://www.braintrust.dev/app/braintrust.dev/p/Text2SQL%20Cookbook/text-2-sql-1706754968
Text2SQL Cookbook (data): 10it [00:00, 42711.85it/s]
Text2SQL Cookbook (tasks): 0%| | 0/10 [00:00<?, ?it/s]
=========================SUMMARY=========================
See results for text-2-sql-1706754968 at https://www.braintrust.dev/app/braintrust.dev/p/Text2SQL%20Cookbook/text-2-sql-1706754968
Once the eval completes, you can click on the link to see the results in the Braintrust UI.
Take a look at the failures. Feel free to explore individual examples, filter down to low answer
scores, etc. You should notice that idx=8
is one of the failures. Let's debug it and see if we can improve the prompt.
We'll first set idx=8
and reproduce the failure.
Here is the ground truth:
print (data[idx][ "question" ])
table = get_table(data[idx][ "table" ])
print (duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , 'SELECT * FROM "table" LIMIT 5' ))
gt_sql = codegen_query(data[idx])
print (gt_sql)
print (duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , gt_sql))
What are the nationalities of the player picked from Thunder Bay Flyers (ushl)
┌─────────┬──────────────────┬────────────┬────────────────┬──────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Pick │ Player │ Position │ Nationality │ NHL team │ College/junior/club team │
│ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │ varchar │
├─────────┼──────────────────┼────────────┼────────────────┼──────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 27 │ Rhett Warrener │ Defence │ Canada │ Florida Panthers │ Saskatoon Blades (WHL) │
│ 28 │ Johan Davidsson │ Left Wing │ Sweden │ Mighty Ducks of An… │ HV71 (Sweden) │
│ 29 │ Stanislav Neckar │ Defence │ Czech Republic │ Ottawa Senators │ HC České Budějovice ( Czech Repu… │
│ 30 │ Deron Quint │ Defence │ United States │ Winnipeg Jets │ Seattle Thunderbirds (WHL) │
│ 31 │ Jason Podollan │ Right Wing │ Canada │ Florida Panthers │ Spokane Chiefs (WHL) │
└─────────┴──────────────────┴────────────┴────────────────┴──────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────┘
SELECT "Nationality" FROM "table" WHERE "College/junior/club team" ILIKE 'Thunder Bay Flyers (USHL)'
┌─────────────┐
│ Nationality │
│ varchar │
├─────────────┤
│ Canada │
└─────────────┘
And then what the model spits out:
output_sql = text2sql(data[idx])
print (output_sql)
duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , output_sql)
SELECT DISTINCT "Nationality"
FROM "table"
WHERE "College/junior/club team" = 'Thunder Bay Flyers (ushl)'
┌─────────────┐
│ Nationality │
│ varchar │
├─────────────┤
│ 0 rows │
└─────────────┘
Hmm, if only the model knew that 'ushl'
is actually capitalized in the data. Let's fix this by providing some sample data for each column:
def text2sql (input):
table = input [ "table" ]
rows = [
{h: row[i] for (i, h) in enumerate (table[ "header" ])} for row in table[ "rows" ]
]
meta = " \n " .join( f '" { h } ": { [row[h] for row in rows[: 10 ]] } ' for h in table[ "header" ])
messages = [
{
"role" : "system" ,
"content" : f """
Print a SQL query (over a table named "table" quoted with double quotes) that answers the question below.
You have the following columns (each with some sample data). Make sure to use the correct
column names for each data value:
{ meta }
The user will provide a question. Reply with a valid ANSI SQL query that answers the question, and nothing else.""" ,
},
{
"role" : "user" ,
"content" : f "Question: {input [ 'question' ] } " ,
},
]
resp = client.chat.completions.create(
model = "gpt-3.5-turbo" ,
messages = messages,
)
sql_text = resp.choices[ 0 ].message.content
return sql_text.rstrip( ";" )
output_sql = text2sql(data[idx])
print (output_sql)
duckdb.arrow(table).query( "table" , output_sql)
SELECT Nationality FROM "table" WHERE "College/junior/club team" = 'Thunder Bay Flyers (USHL)'
┌─────────────┐
│ Nationality │
│ varchar │
├─────────────┤
│ Canada │
└─────────────┘
Ok great! Now let's re-run the loop with this new version of the code.
await EvalAsync(
"Text2SQL Cookbook" ,
data = [
{ "input" : d, "expected" : codegen_query(d), "metadata" : { "idx" : i}}
for (i, d) in enumerate (data[: NUM_TEST_EXAMPLES ])
],
task = text2sql,
scores = [Levenshtein, result_score],
)
Experiment text-2-sql-1706755609 is running at https://www.braintrust.dev/app/braintrust.dev/p/Text2SQL%20Cookbook/text-2-sql-1706755609
Text2SQL Cookbook (data): 10it [00:00, 22562.15it/s]
Text2SQL Cookbook (tasks): 0%| | 0/10 [00:00<?, ?it/s]
=========================SUMMARY=========================
text-2-sql-1706755609 compared to text-2-sql-1706754968:
63.82% (+10.33%) 'SQL Result' score (2 improvements, 1 regressions)
80.53% (+03.66%) 'Levenshtein' score (5 improvements, 3 regressions)
1.22s (-16.20%) 'duration' (8 improvements, 2 regressions)
See results for text-2-sql-1706755609 at https://www.braintrust.dev/app/braintrust.dev/p/Text2SQL%20Cookbook/text-2-sql-1706755609
Congrats 🎉. You've run your first couple of experiments. Now, return back to the tutorial docs to proceed to the next step where we'll analyze the experiments.